Canon RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM vs Canon RF 400mm f/2.8 L IS USM

The bottom line

These cover different focal lengths — the Canon RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM is 100-300mm, the Canon RF 400mm f/2.8 L IS USM is 400mm — so they're not really substitutes. Pick by the field of view you actually need: the Canon RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM for super-telephoto, the Canon RF 400mm f/2.8 L IS USM for super-telephoto.

Choose the Canon RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM if…

  • You shoot wide — it starts at 100mm vs 400mm for landscapes, interiors and architecture.
  • You want one-lens flexibility — a 100-300mm zoom covers what the fixed 400mm can't reframe.
  • You value portability — at 2590g (5.71 lb) it's lighter than the 3450g (7.61 lb) alternative for travel and all-day carry.
  • You use filters or shoot video — internal zoom keeps length and balance constant.

Choose the Canon RF 400mm f/2.8 L IS USM if…

  • You need more reach — it goes to 400mm vs 300mm for distant subjects, wildlife and sport.
  • You prefer a fast, compact single focal length — a 400mm prime over a zoom.

Where they differ

  • Focal range: Canon RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM is 100-300mm, Canon RF 400mm f/2.8 L IS USM is 400mm — different framing and reach.
  • Type: the Canon RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM is a zoom (flexible framing), the Canon RF 400mm f/2.8 L IS USM a prime (one focal length, usually brighter and lighter).
  • Price: the Canon RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM is $9,499, $2,500 under the Canon RF 400mm f/2.8 L IS USM.
  • Weight: the Canon RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM is 2590g (5.71 lb) vs 3450g (7.61 lb) — you'll feel the difference handheld.

Frequently asked

Is the Canon RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM or the Canon RF 400mm f/2.8 L IS USM better?

These cover different focal lengths — the Canon RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM is 100-300mm, the Canon RF 400mm f/2.8 L IS USM is 400mm — so they're not really substitutes. Pick by the field of view you actually need: the Canon RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM for super-telephoto, the Canon RF 400mm f/2.8 L IS USM for super-telephoto.

Who should choose the Canon RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM?

Choose the Canon RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM if you shoot wide — it starts at 100mm vs 400mm for landscapes, interiors and architecture. Choose it if you want one-lens flexibility — a 100-300mm zoom covers what the fixed 400mm can't reframe. Choose it if you value portability — at 2590g (5.71 lb) it's lighter than the 3450g (7.61 lb) alternative for travel and all-day carry. Choose it if you use filters or shoot video — internal zoom keeps length and balance constant.

Who should choose the Canon RF 400mm f/2.8 L IS USM?

Choose the Canon RF 400mm f/2.8 L IS USM if you need more reach — it goes to 400mm vs 300mm for distant subjects, wildlife and sport. Choose it if you prefer a fast, compact single focal length — a 400mm prime over a zoom.

What is the main difference between the Canon RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM and the Canon RF 400mm f/2.8 L IS USM?

Focal range: Canon RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM is 100-300mm, Canon RF 400mm f/2.8 L IS USM is 400mm — different framing and reach.

Product
Optical Design
Focal Length100-300mm400mm
Lens TypeZoomPrime
Optical Elements2317
Optical Groups1813
Aperture & Iris
Maximum Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Minimum Aperturef/32f/32
Aperture Blades119
Rounded ApertureYesYes
Coverage & Angle
Format CoverageFull-FrameFull-Frame
Lens MountCanon RFCanon RF
Angle of View24° – 8°
35mm Equivalent
Focus
AutofocusYesYes
Focus MotorDual Nano USMDual Nano USM
Focus LimiterYesYes
AF/MF SwitchYesYes
Min Focus Distance180 cm250 cm
Max Magnification0.16x0.18x
Stabilization & Video
Optical StabilizationYesYes
Aperture RingNoNo
Declickable ApertureNoNo
ParfocalNoNo
Internal ZoomYesNo
General
Price (MSRP)$9,499$11,999
Filter Size112mm52mm
Diameter128mm163mm
Length329.9mm343mm
Weight2590g (5.71 lb)3450g (7.61 lb)
Weather SealedYesYes
Tripod CollarYesYes