Lens Comparison
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4 L IS USM vs Canon RF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM
Key Differences
- Canon RF 14-35mm f/4 L IS USM has a better min focus distance (20 cm vs 60 cm).
- Canon RF 14-35mm f/4 L IS USM has a better weight (540g (1.19 lb) vs 695g (1.53 lb)).
- Canon RF 14-35mm f/4 L IS USM has a better length (99.8mm vs 119mm).
- Canon RF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM has a better price (msrp) ($1,599 vs $1,699).
- Canon RF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM has a better max magnification (0.28x vs 0.26x).
| Product | ||
|---|---|---|
| Optical Design | ||
| Focal Length | 14-35mm | 70-200mm |
| Lens Type | Zoom | Zoom |
| Optical Elements | 16 | 16 |
| Optical Groups | 12 | 11 |
| Aperture & Iris | ||
| Maximum Aperture | f/4 | f/4 |
| Minimum Aperture | f/22 | f/32 |
| Aperture Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Rounded Aperture | Yes | Yes |
| Coverage & Angle | ||
| Format Coverage | Full-Frame | Full-Frame |
| Lens Mount | Canon RF | Canon RF |
| Angle of View | − | 34° – 12° |
| 35mm Equivalent | − | − |
| Focus | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Focus Motor | Nano USM | Dual Nano USM |
| Focus Limiter | No | Yes |
| AF/MF Switch | Yes | Yes |
| Min Focus Distance | 20 cm | 60 cm |
| Max Magnification | 0.26x | 0.28x |
| Stabilization & Video | ||
| Optical Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
| Aperture Ring | No | No |
| Declickable Aperture | No | No |
| Parfocal | No | No |
| Internal Zoom | No | No |
| General | ||
| Price (MSRP) | $1,699 | $1,599 |
| Filter Size | 77mm | 77mm |
| Diameter | 83.5mm | 83.5mm |
| Length | 99.8mm | 119mm |
| Weight | 540g (1.19 lb) | 695g (1.53 lb) |
| Weather Sealed | Yes | Yes |
| Tripod Collar | No | No |
