Lens Comparison
Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8 L IS USM vs Canon RF 5.2mm f/2.8 L Dual Fisheye
Key Differences
- Canon RF 5.2mm f/2.8 L Dual Fisheye has a better min focus distance (13 cm vs 28 cm).
- Canon RF 5.2mm f/2.8 L Dual Fisheye has a better weight (395g (13.9 oz) vs 840g (1.85 lb)).
- Canon RF 5.2mm f/2.8 L Dual Fisheye has a better length (63.2mm vs 126.8mm).
- Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8 L IS USM has a better aperture blades (9 vs 6).
- Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8 L IS USM has a better max magnification (0.21x vs 0.03x).
| Product | ||
|---|---|---|
| Optical Design | ||
| Focal Length | 15-35mm | 5mm |
| Lens Type | Zoom | Prime |
| Optical Elements | 16 | 10 |
| Optical Groups | 12 | 7 |
| Aperture & Iris | ||
| Maximum Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Minimum Aperture | f/22 | f/22 |
| Aperture Blades | 9 | 6 |
| Rounded Aperture | Yes | No |
| Coverage & Angle | ||
| Format Coverage | Full-Frame | Full-Frame |
| Lens Mount | Canon RF | Canon RF |
| Angle of View | 110° – 63° | − |
| 35mm Equivalent | − | − |
| Focus | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Focus Motor | Nano USM | Nano USM |
| Focus Limiter | No | No |
| AF/MF Switch | Yes | No |
| Min Focus Distance | 28 cm | 13 cm |
| Max Magnification | 0.21x | 0.03x |
| Stabilization & Video | ||
| Optical Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Aperture Ring | No | No |
| Declickable Aperture | No | No |
| Parfocal | No | No |
| Internal Zoom | No | No |
| General | ||
| Price (MSRP) | $2,299 | $2,099 |
| Filter Size | 82mm | − |
| Diameter | 88.5mm | 92.1mm |
| Length | 126.8mm | 63.2mm |
| Weight | 840g (1.85 lb) | 395g (13.9 oz) |
| Weather Sealed | Yes | Yes |
| Tripod Collar | No | No |
