Lens Comparison
Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z vs Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM
Key Differences
- Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z has a better min focus distance (45 cm vs 70 cm).
- Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM has a better length (146mm vs 199mm).
- Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM has a better weight (1070g (2.36 lb) vs 1330g (2.93 lb)).
- Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z has a better aperture blades (11 vs 9).
- Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM has a better price (msrp) ($2,799 vs $2,999).
| Product | ||
|---|---|---|
| Optical Design | ||
| Focal Length | 24-105mm | 70-200mm |
| Lens Type | Zoom | Zoom |
| Optical Elements | 23 | 17 |
| Optical Groups | 18 | 13 |
| Aperture & Iris | ||
| Maximum Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Minimum Aperture | f/22 | f/32 |
| Aperture Blades | 11 | 9 |
| Rounded Aperture | Yes | Yes |
| Coverage & Angle | ||
| Format Coverage | Full-Frame | Full-Frame |
| Lens Mount | Canon RF | Canon RF |
| Angle of View | 84° – 23.5° | 34° – 12° |
| 35mm Equivalent | − | − |
| Focus | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Focus Motor | Dual Nano USM | Dual Nano USM |
| Focus Limiter | No | Yes |
| AF/MF Switch | Yes | Yes |
| Min Focus Distance | 45 cm | 70 cm |
| Max Magnification | 0.29x | 0.23x |
| Stabilization & Video | ||
| Optical Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
| Aperture Ring | No | No |
| Declickable Aperture | No | No |
| Parfocal | No | No |
| Internal Zoom | Yes | No |
| General | ||
| Price (MSRP) | $2,999 | $2,799 |
| Filter Size | 82mm | 77mm |
| Diameter | 88.5mm | 90mm |
| Length | 199mm | 146mm |
| Weight | 1330g (2.93 lb) | 1070g (2.36 lb) |
| Weather Sealed | Yes | Yes |
| Tripod Collar | No | Yes |
