Canon RF 28-70mm f/2 L USM vs Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z

The bottom line

Similar coverage, different speed: the Canon RF 28-70mm f/2 L USM opens to f/2 versus the Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z's f/2.8 — more light and shallower background blur. The Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z gives that up to stay lighter (880g (1.94 lb)). It comes down to how much you value that extra brightness.

Choose the Canon RF 28-70mm f/2 L USM if…

  • You want more light and background blur — f/2 is faster than f/2.8, better for low light and subject separation.
  • You shoot wide — it starts at 28mm vs 70mm for landscapes, interiors and architecture.

Choose the Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z if…

  • You need more reach — it goes to 200mm vs 70mm for distant subjects, wildlife and sport.
  • You shoot handheld or on an unstabilised body — it has optical stabilisation, the other doesn't.
  • You value portability — at 880g (1.94 lb) it's lighter than the 1430g (3.15 lb) alternative for travel and all-day carry.

Where they differ

  • Aperture: the Canon RF 28-70mm f/2 L USM opens to f/2 vs the Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z's f/2.8 — more light and shallower depth-of-field.
  • Focal range: Canon RF 28-70mm f/2 L USM is 28-70mm, Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z is 70-200mm — different framing and reach.
  • Price: the Canon RF 28-70mm f/2 L USM is $3,099, $400 under the Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z.
  • Stabilisation: only the Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z has optical stabilisation — steadier handheld shots, especially on bodies without IBIS.
  • Weight: the Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z is 880g (1.94 lb) vs 1430g (3.15 lb) — you'll feel the difference handheld.

Frequently asked

Is the Canon RF 28-70mm f/2 L USM or the Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z better?

Similar coverage, different speed: the Canon RF 28-70mm f/2 L USM opens to f/2 versus the Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z's f/2.8 — more light and shallower background blur. The Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z gives that up to stay lighter (880g (1.94 lb)). It comes down to how much you value that extra brightness.

Who should choose the Canon RF 28-70mm f/2 L USM?

Choose the Canon RF 28-70mm f/2 L USM if you want more light and background blur — f/2 is faster than f/2.8, better for low light and subject separation. Choose it if you shoot wide — it starts at 28mm vs 70mm for landscapes, interiors and architecture.

Who should choose the Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z?

Choose the Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z if you need more reach — it goes to 200mm vs 70mm for distant subjects, wildlife and sport. Choose it if you shoot handheld or on an unstabilised body — it has optical stabilisation, the other doesn't. Choose it if you value portability — at 880g (1.94 lb) it's lighter than the 1430g (3.15 lb) alternative for travel and all-day carry.

What is the main difference between the Canon RF 28-70mm f/2 L USM and the Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z?

Aperture: the Canon RF 28-70mm f/2 L USM opens to f/2 vs the Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z's f/2.8 — more light and shallower depth-of-field.

Product
Optical Design
Focal Length28-70mm70-200mm
Lens TypeZoomZoom
Optical Elements1918
Optical Groups1314
Aperture & Iris
Maximum Aperturef/2f/2.8
Minimum Aperturef/22f/32
Aperture Blades99
Rounded ApertureYesYes
Coverage & Angle
Format CoverageFull-FrameFull-Frame
Lens MountCanon RFCanon RF
Angle of View75° – 34°34° – 12°
35mm Equivalent
Focus
AutofocusYesYes
Focus MotorRing USMDual Nano USM
Focus LimiterNoYes
AF/MF SwitchYesYes
Min Focus Distance39 cm70 cm
Max Magnification0.18x0.23x
Stabilization & Video
Optical StabilizationNoYes
Aperture RingNoNo
Declickable ApertureNoNo
ParfocalNoNo
Internal ZoomYesYes
General
Price (MSRP)$3,099$3,499
Filter Size95mm77mm
Diameter103.8mm90mm
Length139.8mm146mm
Weight1430g (3.15 lb)880g (1.94 lb)
Weather SealedYesYes
Tripod CollarNoYes