Fujifilm XF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 R LM OIS WR vs Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S

The bottom line

Similar coverage, different speed: the Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S opens to f/2.8 versus the Fujifilm XF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 R LM OIS WR's f/4 — more light and shallower background blur. The Fujifilm XF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 R LM OIS WR gives that up to stay lighter (580g (1.28 lb)) and cheaper ($749). It comes down to how much you value that extra brightness.

Choose the Fujifilm XF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 R LM OIS WR if…

  • You need more reach — it goes to 300mm vs 200mm for distant subjects, wildlife and sport.
  • You're on a budget — $749 vs $2,699 leaves more for other gear.
  • You value portability — at 580g (1.28 lb) it's lighter than the 1440g (3.17 lb) alternative for travel and all-day carry.

Choose the Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S if…

  • You want more light and background blur — f/2.8 is faster than f/4, better for low light and subject separation.

Where they differ

  • Aperture: the Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S opens to f/2.8 vs the Fujifilm XF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 R LM OIS WR's f/4 — more light and shallower depth-of-field.
  • Focal range: Fujifilm XF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 R LM OIS WR is 70-300mm, Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S is 70-200mm — different framing and reach.
  • Price: the Fujifilm XF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 R LM OIS WR is $749, $1,950 under the Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S.
  • Weight: the Fujifilm XF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 R LM OIS WR is 580g (1.28 lb) vs 1440g (3.17 lb) — you'll feel the difference handheld.

Frequently asked

Is the Fujifilm XF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 R LM OIS WR or the Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S better?

Similar coverage, different speed: the Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S opens to f/2.8 versus the Fujifilm XF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 R LM OIS WR's f/4 — more light and shallower background blur. The Fujifilm XF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 R LM OIS WR gives that up to stay lighter (580g (1.28 lb)) and cheaper ($749). It comes down to how much you value that extra brightness.

Who should choose the Fujifilm XF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 R LM OIS WR?

Choose the Fujifilm XF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 R LM OIS WR if you need more reach — it goes to 300mm vs 200mm for distant subjects, wildlife and sport. Choose it if you're on a budget — $749 vs $2,699 leaves more for other gear. Choose it if you value portability — at 580g (1.28 lb) it's lighter than the 1440g (3.17 lb) alternative for travel and all-day carry.

Who should choose the Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S?

Choose the Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S if you want more light and background blur — f/2.8 is faster than f/4, better for low light and subject separation.

What is the main difference between the Fujifilm XF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 R LM OIS WR and the Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S?

Aperture: the Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S opens to f/2.8 vs the Fujifilm XF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 R LM OIS WR's f/4 — more light and shallower depth-of-field.

Product
Optical Design
Focal Length70-300mm70-200mm
Lens TypeZoomZoom
Optical Elements1521
Optical Groups1018
Aperture & Iris
Maximum Aperturef/4f/2.8
Minimum Aperturef/22f/22
Aperture Blades99
Rounded ApertureYesYes
Coverage & Angle
Format CoverageAPS-CFull-Frame
Lens MountFujifilm XNikon Z
Angle of View23° – 5°34° – 12°
35mm Equivalent107-457mm
Focus
AutofocusYesYes
Focus MotorLinearMulti-focus Stepping
Focus LimiterNoNo
AF/MF SwitchNoNo
Min Focus Distance84 cm50 cm
Max Magnification0.21x0.2x
Stabilization & Video
Optical StabilizationYesYes
Aperture RingNoNo
Declickable ApertureNoNo
ParfocalNoNo
Internal ZoomNoNo
General
Price (MSRP)$749$2,699
Filter Size67mm77mm
Diameter78mm89mm
Length132.5mm220mm
Weight580g (1.28 lb)1440g (3.17 lb)
Weather SealedYesYes
Tripod CollarNoYes