Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR vs Fujifilm XF 16-80mm f/4 R OIS WR
The bottom line
Similar coverage, different speed: the Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR opens to f/2.8 versus the Fujifilm XF 16-80mm f/4 R OIS WR's f/4 — more light and shallower background blur. It comes down to how much you value that extra brightness.
Choose the Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR if…
- ✓You want more light and background blur — f/2.8 is faster than f/4, better for low light and subject separation.
- ✓You value portability — at 240g (8.5 oz) it's lighter than the 440g (15.5 oz) alternative for travel and all-day carry.
Choose the Fujifilm XF 16-80mm f/4 R OIS WR if…
- ✓You need more reach — it goes to 80mm vs 50mm for distant subjects, wildlife and sport.
- ✓You shoot handheld or on an unstabilised body — it has optical stabilisation, the other doesn't.
Where they differ
- ›Aperture: the Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR opens to f/2.8 vs the Fujifilm XF 16-80mm f/4 R OIS WR's f/4 — more light and shallower depth-of-field.
- ›Focal range: Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR is 16-50mm, Fujifilm XF 16-80mm f/4 R OIS WR is 16-80mm — different framing and reach.
- ›Stabilisation: only the Fujifilm XF 16-80mm f/4 R OIS WR has optical stabilisation — steadier handheld shots, especially on bodies without IBIS.
- ›Weight: the Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR is 240g (8.5 oz) vs 440g (15.5 oz) — you'll feel the difference handheld.
Frequently asked
Is the Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR or the Fujifilm XF 16-80mm f/4 R OIS WR better?
Similar coverage, different speed: the Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR opens to f/2.8 versus the Fujifilm XF 16-80mm f/4 R OIS WR's f/4 — more light and shallower background blur. It comes down to how much you value that extra brightness.
Who should choose the Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR?
Choose the Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR if you want more light and background blur — f/2.8 is faster than f/4, better for low light and subject separation. Choose it if you value portability — at 240g (8.5 oz) it's lighter than the 440g (15.5 oz) alternative for travel and all-day carry.
Who should choose the Fujifilm XF 16-80mm f/4 R OIS WR?
Choose the Fujifilm XF 16-80mm f/4 R OIS WR if you need more reach — it goes to 80mm vs 50mm for distant subjects, wildlife and sport. Choose it if you shoot handheld or on an unstabilised body — it has optical stabilisation, the other doesn't.
What is the main difference between the Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR and the Fujifilm XF 16-80mm f/4 R OIS WR?
Aperture: the Fujifilm XF 16-50mm f/2.8-4.8 R LM WR opens to f/2.8 vs the Fujifilm XF 16-80mm f/4 R OIS WR's f/4 — more light and shallower depth-of-field.
| Product | ||
|---|---|---|
| Optical Design | ||
| Focal Length | 16-50mm | 16-80mm |
| Lens Type | Zoom | Zoom |
| Optical Elements | 14 | 17 |
| Optical Groups | 11 | 13 |
| Aperture & Iris | ||
| Maximum Aperture | f/2.8 | f/4 |
| Minimum Aperture | f/22 | f/22 |
| Aperture Blades | 9 | 7 |
| Rounded Aperture | Yes | Yes |
| Coverage & Angle | ||
| Format Coverage | APS-C | APS-C |
| Lens Mount | Fujifilm X | Fujifilm X |
| Angle of View | 83° – 32° | 83° – 20° |
| 35mm Equivalent | 24-76mm | 24-122mm |
| Focus | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Focus Motor | Linear | Linear |
| Focus Limiter | No | No |
| AF/MF Switch | No | No |
| Min Focus Distance | 15 cm | 35 cm |
| Max Magnification | 0.27x | 0.25x |
| Stabilization & Video | ||
| Optical Stabilization | No | Yes |
| Aperture Ring | Yes | Yes |
| Declickable Aperture | No | No |
| Parfocal | No | No |
| Internal Zoom | No | No |
| General | ||
| Price (MSRP) | $799 | $799 |
| Filter Size | 62mm | 72mm |
| Diameter | 63mm | 78.3mm |
| Length | 74.9mm | 88.9mm |
| Weight | 240g (8.5 oz) | 440g (15.5 oz) |
| Weather Sealed | Yes | Yes |
| Tripod Collar | No | No |
