Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG DN OS Sports vs Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 Macro G OSS II
The bottom line
Similar coverage, different speed: the Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 Macro G OSS II opens to f/4 versus the Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG DN OS Sports's f/4.5 — more light and shallower background blur. It comes down to how much you value that extra brightness.
Choose the Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG DN OS Sports if…
- ✓You need more reach — it goes to 600mm vs 200mm for distant subjects, wildlife and sport.
Choose the Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 Macro G OSS II if…
- ✓You value portability — at 794g (1.75 lb) it's lighter than the 2490g (5.49 lb) alternative for travel and all-day carry.
- ✓You like close-focus work — 0.5x magnification vs 0.3x.
- ✓You use filters or shoot video — internal zoom keeps length and balance constant.
Where they differ
- ›Aperture: the Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 Macro G OSS II opens to f/4 vs the Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG DN OS Sports's f/4.5 — more light and shallower depth-of-field.
- ›Focal range: Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG DN OS Sports is 60-600mm, Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 Macro G OSS II is 70-200mm — different framing and reach.
- ›Price: the Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 Macro G OSS II is $1,799, $200 under the Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG DN OS Sports.
- ›Close-up: the Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 Macro G OSS II reaches 0.5x magnification vs 0.3x — more for close-up and macro work.
- ›Weight: the Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 Macro G OSS II is 794g (1.75 lb) vs 2490g (5.49 lb) — you'll feel the difference handheld.
Frequently asked
Is the Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG DN OS Sports or the Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 Macro G OSS II better?
Similar coverage, different speed: the Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 Macro G OSS II opens to f/4 versus the Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG DN OS Sports's f/4.5 — more light and shallower background blur. It comes down to how much you value that extra brightness.
Who should choose the Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG DN OS Sports?
Choose the Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG DN OS Sports if you need more reach — it goes to 600mm vs 200mm for distant subjects, wildlife and sport.
Who should choose the Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 Macro G OSS II?
Choose the Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 Macro G OSS II if you value portability — at 794g (1.75 lb) it's lighter than the 2490g (5.49 lb) alternative for travel and all-day carry. Choose it if you like close-focus work — 0.5x magnification vs 0.3x. Choose it if you use filters or shoot video — internal zoom keeps length and balance constant.
What is the main difference between the Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG DN OS Sports and the Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 Macro G OSS II?
Aperture: the Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 Macro G OSS II opens to f/4 vs the Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG DN OS Sports's f/4.5 — more light and shallower depth-of-field.
| Product | ||
|---|---|---|
| Optical Design | ||
| Focal Length | 60-600mm | 70-200mm |
| Lens Type | Zoom | Zoom |
| Optical Elements | 25 | 19 |
| Optical Groups | 19 | 13 |
| Aperture & Iris | ||
| Maximum Aperture | f/4.5 | f/4 |
| Minimum Aperture | f/32 | f/22 |
| Aperture Blades | 11 | 9 |
| Rounded Aperture | Yes | Yes |
| Coverage & Angle | ||
| Format Coverage | Full-Frame | Full-Frame |
| Lens Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
| Angle of View | 40° – 4° | 34° – 12.5° |
| 35mm Equivalent | − | − |
| Focus | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Focus Motor | HLA | XD Linear |
| Focus Limiter | Yes | Yes |
| AF/MF Switch | Yes | Yes |
| Min Focus Distance | 200 cm | 26 cm |
| Max Magnification | 0.3x | 0.5x |
| Stabilization & Video | ||
| Optical Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
| Aperture Ring | No | Yes |
| Declickable Aperture | No | Yes |
| Parfocal | No | No |
| Internal Zoom | No | Yes |
| General | ||
| Price (MSRP) | $1,999 | $1,799 |
| Filter Size | 105mm | 72mm |
| Diameter | 127.8mm | 82.2mm |
| Length | 290.2mm | 149mm |
| Weight | 2490g (5.49 lb) | 794g (1.75 lb) |
| Weather Sealed | Yes | Yes |
| Tripod Collar | Yes | Yes |
