OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark III vs OM System OM-5 Mark II
The bottom line
Same line, different generation: the OM System OM-5 Mark II (2025) moves ahead on burst speed (30fps vs 8fps), resolution (20.4MP vs 16.1MP) and 4K frame rate (60p vs 30p). The OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark III is still the value pick at $699 ($1,199 for the OM System OM-5 Mark II). If those newer features aren't ones you'll actually use, the OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark III gives you most of the experience for less.
Choose the OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark III if…
- ✓You're budget-conscious — it launched at $699, about $500 less, freeing money for lenses.
Choose the OM System OM-5 Mark II if…
- ✓You shoot action, sports or wildlife — 30fps burst plus dedicated subject-tracking AF keeps up with fast, erratic movement where 8fps would drop frames.
- ✓You shoot video seriously — it brings smoother 60p 4K vs 30p, 10-bit internal colour, Log for gradable footage and both mic and headphone jacks for monitored audio.
- ✓You shoot handheld — in-body stabilisation lets you use slower shutter speeds and steadies video, which the other body can't do without a stabilised lens.
- ✓You vlog or shoot handheld solo — the fully-articulating screen flips to face you and there's a mic input for clean audio.
Where they differ
- ›Burst: the OM System OM-5 Mark II shoots 30fps to the OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark III's 8fps — the gap that decides whether you nail the peak moment in sports and wildlife.
- ›Video: the OM System OM-5 Mark II is the stronger video tool — 4K up to 60p, 10-bit internal and Log.
- ›Price: the OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark III launched at $699, $500 under the OM System OM-5 Mark II — money that could go toward glass.
- ›Stabilisation: only the OM System OM-5 Mark II has in-body IS — slower handheld shutter speeds and steadier video without relying on stabilised lenses.
- ›Durability: the OM System OM-5 Mark II is weather-sealed against dust and rain; the other isn't.
- ›Resolution: 20.4MP on the OM System OM-5 Mark II vs 16.1MP — more detail and crop room, at the cost of larger files.
Frequently asked
Is the OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark III or the OM System OM-5 Mark II better?
Same line, different generation: the OM System OM-5 Mark II (2025) moves ahead on burst speed (30fps vs 8fps), resolution (20.4MP vs 16.1MP) and 4K frame rate (60p vs 30p). The OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark III is still the value pick at $699 ($1,199 for the OM System OM-5 Mark II). If those newer features aren't ones you'll actually use, the OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark III gives you most of the experience for less.
Who should choose the OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark III?
Choose the OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark III if you're budget-conscious — it launched at $699, about $500 less, freeing money for lenses.
Who should choose the OM System OM-5 Mark II?
Choose the OM System OM-5 Mark II if you shoot action, sports or wildlife — 30fps burst plus dedicated subject-tracking AF keeps up with fast, erratic movement where 8fps would drop frames. Choose it if you shoot video seriously — it brings smoother 60p 4K vs 30p, 10-bit internal colour, Log for gradable footage and both mic and headphone jacks for monitored audio. Choose it if you shoot handheld — in-body stabilisation lets you use slower shutter speeds and steadies video, which the other body can't do without a stabilised lens. Choose it if you vlog or shoot handheld solo — the fully-articulating screen flips to face you and there's a mic input for clean audio.
What is the main difference between the OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark III and the OM System OM-5 Mark II?
Burst: the OM System OM-5 Mark II shoots 30fps to the OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark III's 8fps — the gap that decides whether you nail the peak moment in sports and wildlife.
| Product | ||
|---|---|---|
| Imaging | ||
| Sensor Type | Live MOS | BSI Stacked Live MOS |
| Sensor Size | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Image Processor | TruePic VIII | TruePic IX |
| Effective Resolution | 16.1 MP | 20.4 MP |
| Lens Mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Exposure Control | ||
| ISO Range (Native) | 200 – 25600 | 200 – 25600 |
| ISO Range (Extended) | 100 – 25600 | 80 – 102400 |
| Mechanical Shutter | 1/4000 | 1/8000 |
| Electronic Shutter | 1/16000 | 1/32000 |
| Flash Sync Speed | 1/250 | 1/250 |
| Built-in Flash | Yes | No |
| Still Image Capture | ||
| Continuous Shooting | 8 fps | 30 fps |
| Video Capture | ||
| Max Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 8K Recording | − | − |
| 4K Recording | Up to 30p | Up to 60p |
| 1080p Recording | Up to 120p | Up to 240p |
| 10-bit Internal | No | Yes |
| Recording Limit | No limit | No limit |
| Log Profiles | − | OM-Log400 / HLG |
| Built-in Mic | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone Jack | No | Yes |
| Mic Input | No | Yes |
| HDMI Output | Micro (Type D) | Micro (Type D) |
| Focus | ||
| Phase Detect Points | 81 | 1,053 |
| Contrast Detect Points | − | − |
| Low Light AF | -1 EV | -7.5 EV |
| Eye AF | No | Yes |
| Animal AF | No | Yes |
| Vehicle AF | No | No |
| Viewfinder | ||
| EVF Type | OLED | OLED |
| EVF Resolution | 1.44M dots | 2.36M dots |
| EVF Magnification | 0.46x | 0.83x |
| Monitor | ||
| LCD Size | 3" | 3" |
| LCD Resolution | 1.04M dots | 1.04M dots |
| LCD Type | Tilting | Vari-Angle |
| Touch Screen | Yes | Yes |
| Interface | ||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | v4.2 | v4.2 |
| USB | Micro USB 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| Memory Card Slots | 1x SD UHS-I | 1x SD UHS-II |
| GPS | No | No |
| General | ||
| Price (MSRP) | $699 | $1,199 |
| Body Material | Polycarbonate | Magnesium Alloy |
| Dimensions | 121.5×83.6×49.5 mm | 125.3×85.2×52 mm |
| Weight | 410g (14.5 oz) | 418g (14.7 oz) |
| Weather Sealed | No | Yes |
| In-Body Stabilization | No | Yes |
| Battery Life (EVF) | 330 shots | 520 shots |
| Battery Life (LCD) | 330 shots | 520 shots |
| Battery Type | BLS-50 | BLX-1 |
